Okey dokey.
Jade:
- Difference between military and paramilitary:
A military is the
official defence force of a sovereign nation or city, whereas a paramilitary - whilst similar in terms of equipment and organisation - is an armed force that is outside of the official armed forces. Private security companies are sometimes considered paramilitaries for this reason; they can be anything from the security of a large trading company (like the East India Trading Companies fleet was by todays definition a paramilitary) to a terrorist organisation or security company. That's all it is
So the trading companies paramilitaries would just be people who are hired and armed by the companies with the intention to protect their interests by force.
- What is a Black Op?
A "Black-op" is short for "Black Flag Operation," in which a team (usually employed by governments, but it can apply to private companies as well) carries out a clandestine mission off-record, with the added objective of disguising who was actually behind it. This could be anything from simple intelligence gathering to assassinations and thefts. Some of James Bonds missions could be considered a Black-Op operation, since some of them require him going undercover to avoid the bad guys knowing who was behind it. When such secrecy is not necessary - so the targets not knowing who was behind it is not an objective - then the operation is simple clandestine. Does that make sense?
- What's a Shadow War?
Here I am using the term to denote a conflict in which none of the companies are actually openly fighting - with big open battles with tanks and planes, etc etc - but are fighting under the illusion of peace. They might say that they are devoted to peace politically, but their paramilitary and Black Ops teams are involved in sabotaging the opposition. Basically, a spy war.
- Procure contracts:
As in, trying to obtain a trade contract from the government. If they have a contract guaranteeing them as the governments major trade partner, they would have a huge financial advantage over the other companies. Any large economically based company wants big contracts, because big contracts not only ensure their relevance in the market for the foreseeable future, it also means big bucks. For instance, a technology company might receive a contract from the DoD to develop some new weapon or computer software exclusively for the military, and in return they get A LOT of money and prestige by being able to say later on "We got a contract from the DoD." It also means that if they do a good job, they are far more likely to get that lucrative deal again next time, which means more money and more respect within the industry.
- The last paragraph:
Well, there's no reason that trolls and whatnot wouldn't be around in the modern day. Have you ever seen a guy so big, he makes your friend down the gym look tiny? Why couldn't he be a troll? They could be remnants of the Old World, almost extinct but with a few members hanging around here and there. And in terms of "what is an orc," there is no one answer. Every book and film has its own vision of what an orc is...for example, the LOTR Orcs are vastly different to those present in Skyrim. Besides, it was just a suggestion of the kind of range we could have. No reason why Orcs can't just be particularly strong but obscenely ugly humans, haha.
Don't worry about not knowing some of this stuff, haha. Everybody has their own areas of expertise.
Zalgo:
Well, it really depends on what type of Changeling you're talking about and whether it fits into the setting that we all agree upon. In folklore, a changeling is simply either the child of a "Fae" that was switched with a human child, or the child that was taken...so if you mean that, then I don't see any reason why not as long as your character is the either the human, or the child of a member of one of the species we eventually decide to include. There's no reason there couldn't be a strain of one of the species that has a penchant for that sort of thing....however, if you mean something else entirely, then perhaps you should explain what you mean when you say "Changeling" before we say yes or no.
On the note of the business experience....well, you don't need business experience to play a member of the company, do you? Do you think the grunts down at the bottom who tap away on keyboards or go on clandestine missions know how to operate a business? Do you think the secretary outside the door knows how to handle a board meeting? If you have no clue how to run a business, just choose one of the roles within that company that doesn't require you to know anything. And if it comes up...either admit to not knowing or bullshit it. *shrug*. That's what I do.
As for the "getting together and surviving," it looks at the moment like people are more leaning towards the factional conflict rather than a group of survivors running from the government. *shrug*. At least, that's my impression from the discussion thus far. I don't think anybody has really been clear on that. So....I propose a vote:
EVERYBODY!
It looks like we have two basic archetypes to choose from.
A) Factional conflict of some kind (no specifics, just two or more groups of people with conflicting objectives bickering and fighting amongst themselves).
B) A group of survivors running/surviving in a world of loose alliances and individuals.
Those seem to be the basic archetypes we're bickering over. So....vote! I vote for A, and I know Zalgo will vote for B, so that's one for each. Jade, Faith and Kristie/Burn It...your decision. And Faith, I'm afraid you can't sit on the fence for this one. If you do, we might end up with a tie and nothing actually being decided, haha.
So...vote!